OpsAlign logo
📋 Acme Corp · Financial Services · May 2025
Overall Score: 2.61 / 5.0
Workspace · Acme Corp
Assessment Dashboard
Overall maturity score, risk exposure, domain breakdown, and priority actions at a glance.
Dollar estimates based on industry benchmarks and onboarding profile data.
Estimated Annual Risk Exposure
$8.4M – $17.4M
Across 9 business risk categories · Revenue, Resilience and Customer Experience are critical
5 Critical 4 Elevated Based on 1,045-question assessment
Maturity Position
2.61
/ 5.0 · Level 3 — Standardized and repeatable
0.89 points below target · Industry benchmark for Financial Services is 3.5+
Current: 2.61Target: 3.5+World-class: 5.0
Target
3
Critical Areas
1
Perception Gap
52
Surveys Completed
1,045
Questions
⚠ Top 3 Issues Requiring Attention
Problem Management
$1.4M
Score 1.93 — lowest in assessment
Same incidents recurring every quarter. No permanent fix owner. 30% of senior engineering time consumed by avoidable work.
View Risk Assessment →
Event Management
$1.2M
Customers detecting outages before IT
Monitoring gaps mean customers experience degradation before any alert fires. Every unmonitored service is a customer experience risk.
View Risk Assessment →
Resilience & Capacity
$2.8M
DR plan untested — RTO/RPO unknown
Capacity planning is reactive. No proactive modelling. Disaster recovery not documented or tested — actual recovery time is unknown.
View Risk Assessment →
View Compliance Overlay →
Percent of mapped framework requirements met, across the 8 frameworks this assessment covers.
Assessment Integrity
Statistical confidence and data quality indicators for this assessment
Confidence score — coming soon
Assessment Period
Participation
Data Points
Domain Coverage
Response Quality
AI Intelligence
Ask OpsAlign
Ask anything about your assessment data. Get answers grounded in your actual scores, findings, and risk exposure — not generic IT advice.
OA

Hello — I'm your OpsAlign intelligence engine.

I have full context of your assessment — all 15 domain scores, 9 risk categories, perception gaps, compliance readiness, and your priority roadmap. Ask me anything.

Try one of the suggestions below, or type your own question.

Which 3 improvements give the most risk reduction per dollar?
We have a SOC 2 audit in 60 days. What do we fix first?
Write 3 talking points for our CFO about Change Management risk
What's driving our perception gap in Incident Management?
If we lose our senior Change Manager, what happens to our risk profile?
Answers are grounded in your assessment data. Always verify critical decisions with your team.
Executive Reports · Domain Intelligence
Domain Reports
One report per domain — executive summary, findings, risk quantification, and prioritised recommendations. Select a domain to generate.
Critical Domains
High Risk Domains
Elevated Domains
Normal Domains
Executive Reports · Acme Corp
Leadership Reports
14 report formats — one for every risk category (plus a combined CFO view) and every C-suite persona. Each generated from your assessment data, written in the language of its audience.
View:
Revenue Risk Brief
Revenue and growth exposure framed for commercial leadership. Change-attributed incidents, undetected outages, SLA penalties, and the dollar cost of IT ops gaps on the top line.
PPTX CRO · CEO · CFO
📊
Operational Cost Brief
OpEx exposure from manual toil, recurring incidents, and operational inefficiency. Cost of inaction vs. investment case. Written for a finance audience.
PPTX CFO · COO · CIO
💰
CFO Risk Brief
Revenue and OpEx risk combined into one dollar-framed document. Cost of inaction, investment case, and ROI of the top 3 improvements. Written in CFO language.
PPTX CFO · Finance Leadership
👤
CX Risk Report
How IT ops failures translate into customer experience degradation. Customer detection vs. IT detection timelines, SLA breach impact, and the invisible damage to trust.
PPTX CCO · CRO · COO
🔐
Security & Compliance Brief
Security posture, compliance gaps across 8 frameworks, audit readiness, and prioritised remediation. Written for a security leadership audience.
PPTX CISO · Security Team · Board
🛡️
Resilience & Continuity Brief
Capacity planning gaps, DR readiness, release risk, and infrastructure exposure. The report for leaders responsible for keeping the lights on.
PPTX CTO · CIO · COO
👥
Workforce Risk Brief
People risk, burnout exposure, succession gaps, and knowledge concentration. The operational evidence HR needs to act — not as a culture issue, but a structural one.
PPTX CHRO · HR Leadership · COO
🤖
Data & AI Risk Brief
CDO · CISO · CIO  ·  PPTX
Data governance gaps, AI risk exposure, data sovereignty posture, and AI regulatory compliance. Written for the CDO and data leadership audience.
Brand Exposure Report
External visibility risk, incident communication maturity, probability of customer-visible failure, and estimated brand recovery cost. The report that gets the CEO's attention.
PPTX CEO · CMO · Board · PR
⚖️
Legal & Regulatory Brief
Compliance gap analysis, regulatory exposure, audit readiness, and the documented liability risk of current operational gaps. Written for legal and compliance leadership.
PPTX General Counsel · CISO · Board
📊
Board Presentation
The boardroom weapon. Risk in dollars, maturity overview, compliance readiness, and investment ask. 6 slides. Minimal. Executive. Tier 3 design language.
PPTX Board · CEO ~6 slides
🎯
CIO Full Assessment
The master document. All 15 domains, sub-process scoring, root cause analysis, perception gaps, compliance mapping, AI readiness, people risk, and the complete prioritised roadmap.
PPTX CIO · VP Engineering
📄
Full Assessment Report
Complete long-form narrative. All 15 domains, all findings, all recommendations. The definitive written record of the assessment. 40–60 pages.
Word CIO · Technical Leads · PMO
⚠️
Risk Exposure Summary
All 9 risk categories in one view. Total exposure across Revenue, OpEx, CX, Security, Resilience, Employee Experience, Brand, Legal, and Data & AI. The number that stops a Board in its tracks.
PPTX CFO · Board · CEO
Gap Analysis · Current vs Target
Gap Assessment
Three views: current vs. target state across all 15 domains, perception gap between leadership and teams, and the aspiration gap in numbers.
Panel 1 of 3
Current State vs. Target State
Each domain shows where your organization is today (current score) against where respondents indicated they want to be (target state). The gap between them is your improvement mandate.
Maturity Radar — All 15 Domains
Current
Target
Perception (VP)
Gap by Domain white line = target
Voice of the Customer
IT Internal NPS
How the business experiences IT — scored by the people who depend on it every day. Results drawn from the IT Internal NPS survey across all respondent levels.
📊
Loading survey results…
Panel 2 of 3
The Perception Gap
Where leadership believes things are vs. where teams on the ground experience them. Gaps ≥ 0.5 are flagged — they represent misaligned investment, unacknowledged risk, and eroded team trust.
Calculating…
Identifying the largest leadership/team perception gap from live assessment data…
Panel 3 of 3
The Aspiration Gap in Numbers
How far is this organization from where it wants to be — and what does closing that gap actually mean in practice?
Planning · Gap Closure
Roadmap
A phased improvement roadmap across all domains with priorities, actions, and investment estimates. Quick Wins build momentum. Structured Programs address root causes. Strategic Initiatives deliver transformational shift.
18-Month Transformation Timeline
Acme Corp · IT Operations Maturity: L2.6 → L3.75
Domain
⚡ Phase 1 — Quick Wins
Months 0–3 · High impact, low effort
🔧 Phase 2 — Structured Programs
Months 3–9 · Process & tooling
🚀 Phase 3 — Strategic Initiatives
Months 9–18 · Transformation
Investment Planning
Estimated Cost to Close the Gap
Rough-order-of-magnitude estimates for each phase. In-house assumes existing staff reallocation. Hired assumes contractor or consulting engagement. Actual costs vary by org size, tooling, and scope.
Analysis · Risk Intelligence
Risk Assessment
Nine categories of business risk identified from your assessment. Click any category to see the specific risks, what's causing them, and how to close the exposure.
$8.4M – $17.4M
Across 8 business risk categories · Based on Acme Corp assessment scores · Industry benchmark modelling
Estimated based on industry benchmarks and onboarding profile data. Actual figures require full financial intake.
2.61
Overall Maturity
Target: 3.5
Action Engine · Acme Corp
Improvement Planner
Disposition each improvement — Accept the Risk, handle In-House, or commission a SOW. The risk register captures all accepted risks in board-ready format.
⊘ Accept Risk 🔧 In-House 📝 SOW
0
Items Selected
$0
Risk Closed
$0
Est. Investment
Timeline
ROI Summary
Select improvements to see your return on investment.
Estimated based on industry benchmarks and onboarding profile data.
Generate Outputs
How it works

Select the improvements you want to prioritise. Items are sorted by risk reduction per dollar — highest ROI first.

The SOW is the formal project document. The Sales Deck is for internal budget approval — designed to be presented to your leadership team.

Analysis · Scored Assessment
Heat Map & Scores
Sub-process and question-level scoring across all 15 domains. Colour intensity reflects average response: red = L1, green = L5. Click any row to see question-level detail.
Score:
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
Click any row to expand question detail
Scores represent average respondent ratings per sub-process and question dimension. N=52 respondents.
Analysis · Root Cause
Why Analysis
Not just what's broken — why it's broken, why it matters, and the business risk if left unresolved. Domains scoring 3.5 or above are operating within acceptable parameters and are not shown. Click any finding to expand.
Planning · Goal Setting
Goals & Planning
Two planning modes: model maturity improvements across all 15 domains and lock in your targets, or project the cost of inaction over an 18-month horizon.
Adjust Domain Scores
Drag to model improvement
Target Lock
Not locked
Adjust the sliders above to model your improvement scenario, then lock in your targets. Locked targets become the official project improvement trajectory.
Score Impact
Current Score
Baseline
2.61
Simulated Score
After changes
2.61
Improvement
Delta
+0.00
no change yet
Domains Changed
Modified
0
None yet
Risk Exposure Delta
Teal = baseline · Green = simulated
Compliance Delta
Analysis Views · Process Intelligence
Process Flow Intelligence
End-to-end process diagrams for each domain, colour-coded by maturity health. Nodes reflect actual assessment scores — teal is healthy, amber is weak, red is broken, grey is missing. Click any node to see the score and finding.
SELECT DOMAIN
Select a domain above
Process health analysis driven by assessment data
Healthy 3.5+ Weak 2.5–3.4 Broken <2.5 Missing
🔄
Select a domain to view its process flow
Each node is colour-coded by the assessment score for that process step
Analysis Views · Operational Intelligence
IT Operations Guide
AI-generated narrative guide per domain. Written for executives and senior stakeholders — plain language, honest about gaps, grounded in the assessment data. Generate on demand, export as PDF.
SELECT DOMAIN
📖
Select a domain to generate its Ops Guide
Each guide is written by AI drawing on the assessment scores, question-level data, and risk profile — producing an executive-readable narrative of how the domain operates and what needs to change.
Analysis · Compliance Intelligence
Compliance Readiness Overlay
OpsAlign maturity scores mapped against 8 major compliance frameworks. Each domain score reflects whether the controls required by each framework are likely met, partially met, or at risk. This is a directional readiness signal — not a formal audit.
SELECT FRAMEWORK
READINESS SCORE
21.9%
controls likely met · 71.9% partial · 6.3% gap
Met Partial Gap
GAPS IDENTIFIED
FRAMEWORK DETAILS
ISO27001
ISO/IEC 27001:2022
Information Security Management System
PRIMARY AUDIENCE
CISO / InfoSec
AUDIT FOCUS AREAS
Access controls, incident response, change management, asset inventory
Domain Readiness for ISO27001
Sorted by highest control gap % first
DOMAIN SEVERITY SCORE CONTROL STATUS IMPACT IF UNADDRESSED
Critical Gaps — Highest-Severity, Lowest-Score Domains
FULL PICTURE
All Frameworks at a Glance
Readiness across all 8 frameworks side by side, computed as a straight count of controls met, partially met, or at gap across every mapped, answered question.
FRAMEWORK CATEGORY READINESS BREAKDOWN MET STATUS AUDIENCE
Analysis · Workforce Intelligence
People & KPI
Respondent profiles, burnout risk, knowledge concentration, and the KPI framework for IT operations performance tracking.
High
Burnout Risk
Problem & Incident teams
3
Knowledge SPOFs
Single points of failure
52
Respondents
VP to operator level
68%
Response Rate
Above benchmark (55%)
Reports · Custom Output
Report Generator
Configure a custom report — choose persona, domains, and format. Generate as PDF, PPTX, or online preview.
📄
Configure your report on the left
Select persona, domains, and format to see a preview
Leadership Report · Board
Board Presentation
The boardroom weapon. Risk in dollars, compliance readiness, investment ask. 6-slide PPTX in Tier 3 executive design.
2.61
Overall Score
Level 2 — Basic
$8.4M–$17.4M
Total Risk Exposure
Across 9 categories
6
Slides
Minimal · Executive
3
SOC 2 Controls at Risk
CC6.8 · CC7.3 · CC9.2
· Risk exposure in dollar terms
· Domain maturity overview
· Perception gap analysis
· Compliance readiness summary
· Priority roadmap with ROI
· Investment case vs cost of inaction
· Three critical findings
· Board recommendation & ask
"The organisation is accepting an estimated $8.4M–$17.4M in annual IT operations risk that could be reduced to under $4M for an investment of $285K–$530K. The payback period is under four months."
Estimated based on industry benchmarks and onboarding profile data.
Leadership Report · Risk Summary
Risk Exposure Summary
All 9 risk categories in one view. The reverse-risk document that frames every finding as a business consequence.
$8.4M–$17.4M
Total Estimated Exposure
Annual · all categories
3
Critical Categories
Revenue · Resilience · CX
6
Elevated Categories
OpEx · Security · Legal · Employee · Brand · Data & AI
· Total exposure across all 9 categories
· Revenue and resilience breakdown
· CX and customer trust risk
· Security and compliance exposure
· Employee experience and burnout risk
· Brand and reputation exposure
· Legal, regulatory, and data & AI liability
· Priority risk reduction roadmap
"$8.4M to $17.4M. That is the range of annual business risk this organisation is currently accepting from IT operations gaps. Three of those eight risk categories are rated Critical — meaning the exposure is active, not theoretical."
Estimated based on industry benchmarks and onboarding profile data.
Leadership Report · Full Assessment
Full Assessment Report
The definitive written record. All 15 domains, all findings, all recommendations. The complete narrative in one document.
15
Domains Assessed
Full IT ops coverage
1,035
Questions
5 dimensions per domain
40–60
Pages
Complete narrative
52
Respondents
VP to operator level
· All 15 domain scores with sub-process breakdown
· Root cause analysis for every finding
· Perception gap analysis by domain
· Compliance framework mapping
· Full prioritised roadmap with costs
· Workforce intelligence summary
· Voice of customer findings
· Investment case and next steps
"This report represents the complete diagnostic picture of Acme Corp's IT operations maturity. It is the document the CIO and their leadership team should use as the primary reference for every investment and prioritisation decision made in the next 12 months."
Estimated based on industry benchmarks and onboarding profile data.
Risk Report · CFO
CFO Risk Brief
Revenue and operational cost risk combined into one dollar-framed document. The investment case and cost of inaction. Written for CFO and Finance Leadership.
Total Risk Exposure (Revenue + OpEx)
Live figure · current assessment data
Weakest Contributing Domain
Category Risk Level
Based on current assessment
• Total risk exposure across all 8 categories
• Revenue risk: incident cost and frequency
• OpEx risk: manual toil and recurring costs
• Cost of inaction over 12 and 24 months
• Investment required for top 3 improvements
• ROI model with payback period
• Comparison to equivalent consulting cost
• Prioritised investment recommendation
Loading current assessment data…
Dollar figures based on industry benchmarks and onboarding profile data, applied to this assessment's real scores. Generate the full report for the complete investment case.
Risk Report · Security
Security & Compliance Brief
Security posture, compliance gaps, and audit readiness. Written for CISO, Security Team, and Board.
Estimated Annual Security Risk Exposure
Live figure · current assessment data
Weakest Contributing Domain
Category Risk Level
Based on current assessment
• Security posture score across all domains
• SOC 2 control gap analysis (Type I & II)
• ISO 27001 Annex A mapping
• NIST CSF readiness by function
• CMDB and asset governance gaps
• Change control audit trail exposure
• Prioritised remediation for audit prep
• Evidence collection requirements
Loading current assessment data…
Risk Report · Employee Experience
Workforce Risk Brief
People risk, burnout exposure, and succession gaps. The operational evidence HR needs — not a culture issue, a structural one. Written for CHRO, HR Leadership, and COO.
Estimated Annual Workforce Risk Exposure
Live figure · current assessment data
Weakest Contributing Domain
Category Risk Level
Based on current assessment
• Burnout risk indicators by domain and team
• After-hours escalation frequency data
• Knowledge concentration risk mapping
• Single points of failure identification
• Succession gap analysis for key roles
• Training and upskilling gap assessment
• Cost of attrition in operational context
• Workforce risk reduction roadmap
Loading current assessment data…
Leadership Report · CIO
CIO Full Assessment
The master document. All 15 domains, sub-process scoring, root cause, perception gaps, compliance mapping, AI readiness, people risk, and the complete prioritised roadmap.
2.61
Overall Score
Target 3.5 · Gap 0.89
4
Critical Domains
Score below 2.5
+0.94
Perception Gap
IM: VP vs IC · Exceeds threshold
1,035
Data Points
52 respondents · 15 domains
· All 15 domain scores + sub-process breakdown
· 5-dimension scoring (People/Process/Tech/Data/Gov)
· Perception gap analysis — full detail
· Compliance mapping across 8 frameworks
· AI/automation readiness score
· Knowledge concentration risk map
· Full prioritised roadmap with effort/cost
· What-if improvement scenarios
"For nine years this organisation has run IT operations on instinct and experience. This assessment gives the CIO the data to run it on evidence — and the language to communicate that evidence to every stakeholder who needs to act on it."
Estimated based on industry benchmarks and onboarding profile data. Actual figures require full financial intake.
Risk Report · Revenue
Revenue Risk Brief
IT operations gaps translated into revenue and growth exposure. Written for CRO, CEO, and CFO.
Estimated Annual Revenue Exposure
Live figure · current assessment data
Weakest Contributing Domain
Category Risk Level
Based on current assessment
• Revenue exposure by incident type and frequency
• Change-attributed incident cost modelling
• Undetected outage revenue impact
• SLA breach penalty exposure
• Customer detection timeline analysis
• Revenue risk reduction roadmap
• ROI of top 3 improvements on revenue
• 12-month revenue protection scenario
Loading current assessment data…
Dollar figures based on industry benchmarks and onboarding profile data, applied to this assessment's real scores. Generate the full report for the complete investment case.
Risk Report · OpEx
Operational Cost Brief
Operational inefficiency and avoidable cost exposure. Written for CFO, COO, and CIO.
Annual OpEx Risk
Live figure · current assessment data
Weakest Contributing Domain
Category Risk Level
Based on current assessment
• Recurring incident cost modelling
• Manual toil cost by process area
• Senior resource time leakage analysis
• Knowledge management cost of gaps
• Automation opportunity assessment
• Cost of inaction over 12/24 months
• Investment case and payback period
• OpEx reduction roadmap
Loading current assessment data…
Dollar figures based on industry benchmarks and onboarding profile data, applied to this assessment's real scores. Generate the full report for the complete investment case.
Risk Report · Customer Experience
CX Risk Report
How IT operations failures translate into customer experience degradation. Written for CCO, CRO, and COO.
Annual CX Risk Exposure
Live figure · current assessment data
Weakest Contributing Domain
Category Risk Level
Based on current assessment
• Customer detection vs IT detection timeline
• Service visibility gap map by platform
• SLA breach frequency and customer impact
• Incident communication quality score
• Voice of Customer gap analysis
• CX perception gap (IT belief vs reality)
• NPS impact modelling
• CX risk reduction roadmap
Loading current assessment data…
Dollar figures based on industry benchmarks and onboarding profile data, applied to this assessment's real scores. Generate the full report for the complete investment case.
Risk Report · Resilience
Resilience & Continuity Brief
Capacity, continuity, and infrastructure risk. Written for CTO, CIO, and COO.
Annual Resilience Risk
Live figure · current assessment data
Weakest Contributing Domain
Category Risk Level
Based on current assessment
• Capacity planning gap analysis
• DR plan status and test history
• Actual vs documented RTO/RPO
• Release failure rate and root cause
• Infrastructure visibility coverage
• Single points of failure mapping
• Resilience improvement roadmap
• Business continuity risk score
Loading current assessment data…
Dollar figures based on industry benchmarks and onboarding profile data, applied to this assessment's real scores. Generate the full report for the complete investment case.
Risk Report · Brand & Reputation
Brand Exposure Report
External visibility risk and incident communication maturity. Written for CEO, CMO, and Board.
Annual Brand & Reputation Risk
Live figure · current assessment data
Weakest Contributing Domain
Category Risk Level
Based on current assessment
• External visibility risk score by service
• Incident communication maturity assessment
• Customer-visible event probability model
• Social and media exposure analysis
• Industry benchmark comparison
• Brand recovery cost modelling
• Proactive communication capability score
• Brand risk reduction roadmap
Loading current assessment data…
Dollar figures based on industry benchmarks and onboarding profile data, applied to this assessment's real scores. Generate the full report for the complete investment case.
Risk Report · Data & AI
Data & AI Risk Brief
Data governance gaps, AI risk exposure, data sovereignty posture, and AI regulatory compliance. Written for the CDO and data leadership audience.
Annual Data & AI Risk Exposure
Populated on generation from live assessment data
Data Governance Maturity
Across domains tagged to this risk category
Gap Band
Current severity vs. target
• Data governance and quality gap analysis
• AI/ML operations maturity by domain
• Data sovereignty and residency exposure
• AI regulatory compliance posture (e.g. EU AI Act)
• Model risk and oversight gaps
• Investment case for closing data/AI gaps
• ROI of top-ranked improvement actions
• Data & AI risk reduction roadmap
Generate the report to see the real headline finding for this organization — grounded in its own assessment data, not a preview placeholder.
Workforce Intelligence · Acme Corp
Workforce Context
The interpretive lens for every score in this assessment. Team composition, work arrangement, time zone spread, tenure distribution, and organisational disruption — rolled up at every level.
12
Time Zones
34%
MSP / Third-Party
39%
Non-English Primary
31%
<12mo Tenure
18%
4yr+ (Knowledge Risk)
⚠ Knowledge Cliff Detected
60% of institutional expertise (4yr+ tenure) represents only 18% of headcount. If 2–3 senior staff leave, MTTR on core systems increases an estimated 55–70%.
Structural complexity per manager's team — click a row for the underlying factors.
Org-wide avg ·
Reported during onboarding — the single biggest driver of Complexity Index.
Each manager's own estimate, given at onboarding, of what share of their team lacks the skills or experience needed to perform their current role effectively — a direct self-report, not a derived score. It's one of the inputs to Team Complexity above, shown here on its own because it points at a different remediation (training/hiring) than the other complexity factors (tenure, offshore mix, time zones) do.
Each column represents one hour offset (UTC-10 to UTC+12). Darker = more team members in that time zone band; empty columns mean no one is there. The golden hour — when all populated time zones overlap — is 10:00–11:00 UTC.
The following domains show scores that should be interpreted in light of structural context factors — not as pure capability measurements.
Action Engine · Committed Plan
Your Improvement Plan
Your dispositions translated into a committed timeline. Adjust resource allocation to see how SOW vs in-house choices affect speed, cost, and risk closure.
🚀
No plan dispositioned yet
Go to the Improvement Planner and disposition each item as Accept Risk, In-House, or SOW. Your committed plan will appear here.
Action Engine · Delivery Tracking
PMO Tracker
Recommended schedule, dependency warnings, and disposition tracking for everything you've committed to in Your Improvement Plan.
SOW items are sequenced within each domain (a domain's Phase 1 must finish before its Phase 2 begins) and run in parallel across domains. In-house items are spread across as many parallel work lanes as needed to keep everything inside an 18-month target, still respecting each domain's own sequential order. Timeline adjusts automatically with the allocation slider in Your Improvement Plan. Dependency warnings indicate where a risk has been accepted by the business and won't be resolved as part of this project — the impact to the outcome may not yield the full benefits depending on the severity of the dependency. They render directly below the chart when applicable.
0 Risk Accepted
0 Items Commissioned via SOW
0 In-House Items
SOW Title Status Value Generated Signed Closed Actions
No SOW records yet. Click "+ Log SOW / Update Status" to add one.
In-House Items — PMO Tracking
Item Domain Status Completed Actions
No in-house items dispositioned yet.
SOW Items — PMO Tracking
Item Domain Status Completed Actions
No items commissioned via SOW yet.
The CSV includes every dispositioned item as a project-schedule structure — dates, duration, and predecessors are left blank for your PMO to fill in against real team assignments, not pre-filled with our planning estimates.
Workforce Intelligence · AI-Powered
Contextual Coaching
AI-generated coaching plans that account for team structure, not just performance scores. Select a manager to generate a bespoke plan grounded in their team's actual context.
How this works: OpsAlign reads the manager's team context profile — composition, tenure, time zones, recent disruption — alongside their domain scores, and generates a bespoke coaching plan using AI. The plan explains structural context before making any performance assessment.
🧠
Select a manager to generate their coaching plan
The AI reads their full context profile before generating any assessment or recommendation.
Analysis Views · SLA & KPI Framework
SLA & KPI Generator
Domain-specific SLA frameworks calibrated to actual maturity level and team context. Each SLA paired with the KPIs needed to measure it. Current, transition, and aspirational tiers.
Workforce Intelligence · Goal Framework
Performance Goals
Cascading maturity improvement goals from CIO to manager level. Context-adjusted targets based on team composition.
Settings
Assessment Configuration
Manage respondents, domain scope, and assessment parameters.
● ACTIVE

Control who can view this workspace and at what permission level.

Email Role Added Actions
Loading…

Survey participation status. Use per-row actions to resend invitations to individuals.

Name Email Type Status Last Activity Actions
Loading…
Start date
Set at launch · read-only
Close date
Assessment Locked

Locking stops all new survey submissions and marks data collection complete. This uses the first of the two assessments included in the annual licence.

Domains included in this assessment cycle. Scope changes are permitted while the assessment is ACTIVE and locked once closed.

Loading domain scope…

Settings
Account & Billing
Licence status, payment history, and account management.
● ACTIVE
Plan
Licence holder
Status
Renewal date
Payment path
Assessment cycles
this year
2 assessment cycles per year
All 15 domains per cycle
Unlimited respondents per cycle
Full report suite
Workspace user management
Date Description Amount Status Invoice
Loading…
Used to auto-populate contracts (MSA/SOW). Not shown to survey respondents.
Account actions — click to expand